Management Information Systems Project Research Paper

Management Information Systems Project - Research Paper Example The dot.com bubble was a cycle that emerged in form of nuttiness. Although the dot.com bubble was a new bust, it was not the first bubble to come up. This is because there was the CD-ROM bubble that was in existence. This CD-ROM bubble was from the companies like the bill gate’s company by the name â€Å"information at your fingertips†. This company was among the companies that were the watchword of the world. Another example of a company that was with the CD-ROM bubble is the Microsoft home (Preissl, Bouwman & Steinfield, 2004). The chief reason for the upcoming of the dot.com was to offer an e- commerce service to the computer internet users. The bubble was basically for the marketing in the internet to the potential client. The dot.com bubble aimed at increasing the internet stock market for specific companies which were calling themselves the dot.com. The NASDAQ was at the highest level of its stock marketing records during the dot.com bubble. Subsequently, NASDAQ i s the dominant and widely known for the market capitalization. For instance, the NASDAQ in the year of 2000 was able to make up to about 5048.62 peak value, which was double the previous year’s amount which was roughly 2500. This was consequently termed the2000 burst as the cataclysmic. The chief examples of the big busts that were capable of buying these bubbles included the Microsoft Company, the dell, and also the Intel Company. Additionally, the Cisco Company, the oracles and also the sun Microsystems Company. These companies were competent of venturing into this business by funding the bubble. For instance, a sum of approximately 600 US Dollars was put for utilization in the starting up of the wed 2.0. Unfortunately, this funding did not lead to the subsequent success of the bubble. Thus it was a loss to the companies that put their money into the venture. Moreover, these companies that were dealing with the internet business were known by the name of the â€Å"four hor semen of the NASDAQ.† this was chiefly due to their significance in the contribution of the capitalization in the business industry (Preissl, Bouwman & Steinfield, 2004). Unfortunately, the NASDAQ lost a huge sum of cash during the funding of the web 2.0 and also the dot.com. This is because the NASDAQ businesses thought that they were going to get a higher amount of revenue from the investments in this bubble. The chief significant acquisitions market is the sole vital and further the only feasible supply of the potential startup of this bubble. Though there has been a significantly large and further potential high profile of the web 2.0 acquirement, the investors have subsequently been reducing their potential expectations since the time of 1998 (Argenti & Barnes, 2009). Evidently, the price of these companies that was capable of acquiring was large during the first year of the funding. Unfortunately the amount began to reduce for the next coming financial years, thus leadin g these companies into a financial loss (Preissl, Bouwman & Steinfield, 2004). We learn from the dot.com bubble that when making long-term investments, we should do it when prices are not overvalued as well as when fundamentals are good, especially when it comes to stock market. This is because the market is bound to clash due to overvaluing of prices as well as due to poor fundamentals. In case of short-term investments, one should trade and upon getting the profit, move out. Last, one should be skeptical when a company is promising to make life-altering